How To Start Film Photography For £27

One of the major reasons people are afraid to explore film photography is the perceived expense.

They’re concerned that to even get set up you need to spend hundreds of pounds on a capable camera and lens, and that’s before you even think about buying and processing film.

This is largely a myth, and this post is to show you how to get set up and started with some super capable kit for less than £30.

First, the camera. 

Whilst I love Pentax and Contax bodies, if I was starting out with film again, based on the knowledge I’ve gained over the last four years and 100+ cameras, I’d buy a Canon EOS.

Canon EOS 300V, Yashica ML 50mm f/1.4 C/Y lens

No, they’re not the most glamorous or exciting to look at, nor do they have the luxury of the aforementioned Contax, or a huge bright viewfinder like a Minolta X-700.

But here’s a list of reasons why a humble EOS makes more sense than anything else. 

  1. Affordable. My first EOS, a 500, I bought for 99p plus a couple pounds postage. The 300V above, one of the last models made around 2002, was around £15.
  2. Plentiful. I just searched EOS in the film cameras category on eBay UK, from UK sellers, under £20 and found over 300 results. Obviously some models are better spec’d than others. I really like the super cheap 500. There are currently 35 of these for sale under £10.
  3. Small, light, compact. The advantage of a plastic (though pretty robust feeling) build is light weight. The EOS bodies are small too, especially examples like the 300V above. Cleverly though, they don’t feel cramped to hold, with a good sized ergonomically contoured handle.
  4. Adaptable. EOS are the compatibly kings, with simple adapters available for any number of other vintage lenses. These typically cost £5-10 each. This means you can have one EOS body and the pick of lenses from Zeiss, Asahi/Pentax, Minolta, Olympus, Yashica and many more, just by using a different adapter.
  5. Ease of use. The EOS bodies are easy to handle and easy to use, especially if you’re coming from digital cameras. Most have a similar mode dial, and later ones like the 300V have an LCD display on the back to show the major settings. Film loading and ISO setting is all automated. You can pick up an EOS and starting shooting in minutes, yet still have a depth of options you can explore as you become more experienced and adventurous.
  6. Features. The EOS 300v has an ISO range from 6 to 6400, shutter speeds from 30s down to 1/2000s, +/-2 exposure compensation and excellent metering. Pretty much all the options you’ll ever need. If you don’t know or care what most of this means, just note point 5 above – they’re easy to just pick up and use!
  7. Forward compatibility. If you invest in a film EOS, an adapter or two and a handful of lenses, at a later date you can get a digital EOS SLR and all the lenses and adapters will fit straight on. It’s the same mount. So with two EOS bodies – one film, one digital – and a few adapters and lenses, you you can have a tremendous range of shooting options at your disposal. But let’s get back to this 35 film set up.
Canon EOS 500, Fujinon 55mm f/1.8 M42 lens, Fuji Superia 100 expired film

So we have our bargain body. Next, the lens. 

I would suggest starting with a 50mm lens. On the whole, prime (ie non zoom) lenses tend to give better quality images than zooms. You could go for an AutoFocus (AF) lens in the native Canon EF mount that the EOS cameras use. But I would go for a more vintage option, via one of the aforementioned adapters, which are cheaper, much more satisfying to hold and use, and more fun.

There’s little to choose between the 50mm lenses of the major brands.

And as mentioned above, the EOS bodies are hugely adaptable. Personally I’ve settled on M42 and C/Y (Contax/Yashica) mounts.

In M42 you have a vast range of fantastic quality lenses available, such as the Asahi Takumars, Helios 44 series, Fujinons, Yashicas and Pentacons. Any of these can be had for around £20.

Pentax MG, Yashica Yashinon-DS 50mm f/2 M42 lens, FujiColor C200 expired film

I paid £7 for my Helios 44-2 and have had excellent Pentacon 50/1.8s for less than £10. Yashicas can be brilliant buys too, again less than £10, like the one I used to shoot the photograph above.

A Takumar 55/2 can be bought for £15 – many turn their nose up at the f/2 version in favour of the f/1.8, but the truth is they are the same lens, just with the max aperture slightly disabled on the f/2. I’ve had both and can’t tell the difference in the final image.

Pentax MG, Pentacon Auto 50mm f/1.8 M42 lens, Fuji Superia 100 expired film

In C/Y mount the Yashica ML range are a very good buy.

Again most go for the faster lenses, the 50/1.4 (as pictured on the Canon EOS 300V in the first image above), or the 50/1.7. They’re still cheap (I paid about £30 for my 50/1.4, and a shade over £20 for a 50/1.7) but the bargain of the range is again the f/2. Performance is near identical to the other two, and the very common 50/2 can be had for less than £20, even less than £15.

Contax 167MT, Yashica ML 50mm f/2 lens, Fuji Superia 200 expired film

The Pentax K mount also offer a fantastic range, and the Pentax-M 50/1.7 or 50/2 won’t disappoint. Also very impressive in this mount are the Auto Chinon 50/1.7 and Rikenon 50/2.

Minolta made some very fine lenses in their day too.

If you want a luxurious, weighty feel, go for an older 50, like an MC Rokkor-PF – they’re smoother than virtually all other vintage lenses I’ve used, bar except the Takumars.

If you want comparable performance but in a smaller, lighter package, try one of the cracking later era Minolta MD 50/1.7s. I got one a few months back attached to a Minolta X-300, both fully working, for £15.

Minolta X-300, Minolta MD 50mm f/1.7 lens, Fuji Superia 100 expired film

So to recap our (lack of) spending so far.

At the cheapest end, a Canon EOS body is available from around £5, and something like an M42 or Minolta or C/Y to EOS adapter start at around £7. If you’re patient, you’ll find an M42 Yashica Yashinon 50/2, C/Y mount Yashica ML 50/2 or Minolta MD 50/1.7 for £15.

This takes your total to £27.

If you want a slightly later body, say a 300V or 300X (though the 500 is stunning value), you might need to spend £15 or £20.

If you want a faster, more sought after lens, like a Pentax-M 50/1.7 or Takumar 55/1.8, you might need to invest £25.

Pentax MZ-5N, Pentax-M 50mm f/1.7 lens, AgfaPhoto Vista Plus 200

The choice is yours, depending on your budget and interest.

This post is primarily about getting you set up with some quality, highly usable and enjoyable kit to shoot film with, so I don’t want to go into depth about film and processing.

I would point out though that a cheap and very capable film over here in the UK is AgfaPhoto Vista Plus 200, available for £1 a roll from Poundland.

Expired film can also be very cheap, and give fantastic results.

I get my film processed and scanned to CD (no prints) either at Asda for about £3.50 a roll, or at my photo store up the road which is around £4.50-5 a roll. Having three or four rolls processed at the same time and burned to the same CD saves a few pounds.

It’s not as cheap as digital per shot, but with film, as I hope I’ve shown here, getting set up can be very cheap indeed – under £30.

After that, with a modest budget of £20 a month you can shoot a film a week. Or for £10, one a fortnight.

Which, for virtually all of us, is still a very affordable, and infinitely pleasurable hobby indeed.

Canon EOS 500, Fujinon 55mm f/1.8 M42 lens, Fuji Superia 100 expired film

If you have any questions, or any tips of your own, please join the conversation in the comments below.

Thanks for reading. Please share this post with others you feel will enjoy it too.


24 thoughts on “How To Start Film Photography For £27”

  1. Cracking good post. One thing about the EOS bodies: the Rebels used cheap shutters, prone to failure. When looking to buy one, open the back. If you see black goo, or marks in an arc, on the shutter curtain, it’s dead or dying and you should move on. I recommend moving up to the Elans, as they used more robust shutters. Even the semi-pro bodies can be had for cheap, like my $27 A2e.

    Hmmmmmmm… maybe I should buy an M42 adapter for it!!

    1. Thanks for that extra info Jim!

      I’ve only had an EOS 500 (Rebel XS) and an EOS 300V (Rebel Ti) so my experienced is based on those bodies only, so your wider experience is valuable.

      I had looked at the more pro level models but they seem to all be much bigger and heavier.

      Something I love about the 300V especially is it’s about as small as you’d want an SLR to be and probably only weighs about 350g.

      You should definitely try an adapter for your M42 lenses, especially if you enjoy using the EOS anyway!

      1. Maybe try a later Rebel if you get the chance Jim, they made them up until about 2004 I believe. I can’t imagine a camera that new is going to have any major faults for years.

  2. I agree. Great post Dan. I may look into a M42 adapter for my EOS 2000. I have dozens of M42 lenses (Yashica, Tominon and Fujinon) just gathering dust – I enjoy my simple EOS so with an adapter I can play with the lenses more often.
    Nice images too Dan!

    1. Chris, the M42 > EOS adapters are ridiculously cheap. I actually got mine free with an M42 lens I bought from a guy in Germany. I didn’t even have an EOS at the time, and it prompted me to take a look at them as an option with M42! I have just the simple metal adapter, no pins or chips or anything. Those M42s are too special to be gathering dust!

  3. Great Post, Dan:) Another couple of points worth noting about EOS bodies’EF Mount.
    You can usually get better value if you buy a EOS body with a lens attached e.g. Sigma 28-200mm lens+500n=£60(Nephews christmas present)! Also, Sigma EF lenses built prior to 2000/2001 will not work on current Canon EOS Dslr bodies(Canon upgraded their firmware on their cameras at that time), hence they usually go cheaper than their Canon counterparts. Managed to buy 3 Sigma lenses much cheaper that way (24mm, 70-210mm, 100-300mm). Win win:)

    1. Hi Marcus, that’s interesting about the Sigma lenses. How do you know when looking which are the older versions? I have thought about looking at an EF AF lens (I’ve only ever used EOS bodies with adapters for manual lenses), but the obvious choice was a Canon 50/1.8, and I have so many great options in 50mm in other mounts, it didn’t seem worth it. I might take a browse at the Sigmas though and something wider…

  4. Excellent stuff Dan! Another 1+ for Canon. I recommend EOS bodies to all film newbies I meet. They are reliable and cheap. Some of them use hard to find/expensive batteries so it’s best to check first.

    1. Yes I think the two I’ve had used different batteries. eBay is a good source to make them more affordable.

      Recommending an EOS body does for me seem almost unfaithful to my favourite Pentax and Contax bodies, as they offer a more luxurious and vintage experience, but for affordability, convenience, ease of use and a bunch of other reasons, it’s hard to look beyond the EOS options…

      I’m debating a cheap EOS DSLR too so I can have even further compatibility across my lens collection…

  5. Good post Dan but just wondered why you’d not mentioned either the later plastic Nikons or Pentax bodies. Many consumer AF Nikon bodies can be picked up peanuts and if you get the right model unlike the EOS you can use vintage Nikon AI MF lens from the 1970’s on without needing a converter. Similarly later Pentax bodies can be cheap and most have even more legendary support for k mount lenses

    1. Hi Alan, thanks for the additional suggestions.

      On the Nikon front, I’ve never owned a Nikon SLR so have no frame of reference.

      All I know from the research I’ve done is that even their most basic 50/1.8 lens for example seems to be really expensive, and alone would be way more than the £27 total for the set up I was recommending.

      Re Pentax, yes I’ve had two or three of the late MZ series and was, in many ways, really impressed.

      I’ve had an MZ-5N and MZ-6 and liked them both for their compact size, very good handling, and of course the fantastic Pentax K lenses – Pentax-M, Chinon and Ricoh all made cracking 50s.

      They also have a visual and audible focus confirm when used with the manual focus PK lenses, which I found essential, because the one thing I struggled with was the viewfinder.

      I haven’t had a Canon EOS and Pentax MZ at the same time and compared them directly, but I find both EOS bodies I’ve had pretty easy to focus with, and I know I struggled with the MZs. For me this is a dealbreaker.

      I believe there’s an MZ-M (the eventual successor to the ubiquitous K1000) that has a manual focus screen with split prism, but again from reviews I’ve seen the main complaint is the small and dark VF.

      Having said that, I am wondering about getting a PK 50mm lens again. Though my favourite bodies are Contax, I’m not loving the C/Y lenses as much. So I may just use M42 lenses with the Contax and get a couple of PK lenses and use on the EOS with adapter, and sell my C/Y lenses.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s