Though it wasn’t the first bike I was given, the first I really loved was a blue Raleigh Burner BMX, with yellow mag wheels and matching pad set.
Coming of bicycling age in the midst of BMX’s original heyday, most of my friends also had one.
Those whose parents couldn’t stretch to a revered Diamond Back or Mongoose or Skyway (which in my village was everyone!), mostly had a Burner.
Mine was a step up from the standard red model with spoked wheels, but not one of the higher end models like the black and gold Ultra Burner or its photographically negative sibling, the gold and black Super Tuff Burner.
Nevertheless I was very happy with my Burner, and lived on it after school and at weekends for years.
So naturally, Raleigh, and their famous red heron head badge, holds fond memories for me.
After becoming more curious about bikes again a few months back, I’ve started looking beyond the bikes I know about from experience – which were essentially 80s BMXs and 90s mountain bikes.
Because I soon realised, the feelings I seek from the cycling experience have evolved.
I’m intrigued about bikes that are more about getting around more gently, more gracefully, and more enjoyably than the flat out hammering that BMXs and MTBs tend to encourage, if not outright demand.
Which led me to the genre of mixte bicycles.
The main feature of the mixte (pronounced MIX-tee in English) is a double top tube that extends all the way down to the rear wheel, bisected by the seat tube, rather than the traditional horizontal top tube in a diamond frame.
This design is said to offer the strength of a diamond frame, with the convenience of a lower step over height and less weight overall.
The genre has given rise to some very elegant and handsome bicycles.
Before you ask, though in some cultures the mixte is seen as more as a ladies bike, its origins in France in the early 20th century – and its name – came from the desire for a mixed gender bicycle, equally appealing and comfortable to men and women.
So no, I’m not looking at girls’ bikes.
A little further research and some eBay browsing later, I found a Raleigh mixte bike from the mid 80s on sale locally, and went to see it.
The owner wasn’t interested in a cash offer, and seemed to think there would be a bidding frenzy. “I’m not sure what it’s worth, but they go for hundreds in London you know,” he told me.
So I bided my time, watched the auction, put in a bid at the opening price of £29.95 and five seconds later with no sign of that avalanche of interest the seller anticipated, the Raleigh was mine. For less than I was ready to offer him a week previously. And you know I love a bargain!
So I picked it up, and based on my previous viewing, expected it to not be rideable, needing two tyres, new cables, perhaps a new saddle and some serious derailleur adjustment.
But when I got it home and tried putting some air in the quite probably original and rather cracked Raleigh Supalites, they pumped up fine and appeared to hold. The saddle needs it cover securing but after a quick tighten is perfectly functional.
And the gears and brakes, with a few repeated and careful actuations, seemed fine too.
So I took it for a gentle spin up the road, and then, confidence growing as steadily as the grin on my face, went the length of a local lane I frequently use to blow away the cobwebs on a bike.
The Raleigh not only survived the journey without mechanical incident, it was almost shockingly breezy to ride.
I’ve never had a mixte bike, nor one with drop handlebars, and both were a revelation.
The frame feels robust but light, and whilst I wasn’t hopping on and off it along the way, the low step over height inspires a more safe feeling, and makes the bike feel smaller and more manoeuvrable.
With the drop bars I started out in my default hand position from using flat bars. But already, the far narrower width felt more comfortable and again made the bike feel more compact and nimble.
Along the way I experimented with different hand positions, and enjoyed the freedom and variety this gave me. With straight bars there’s really only position you can have your hands in.
A third novelty to me was the gear shifters on the stem (thankfully not on the down tube, which looks scary to me!). I’ve only ever used thumb or rapid fire shifters.
The extra space this gave my hands to roam on the bars was very welcome. It also meant I was shifting far less often than when the lever is right there at the tip of my thumb, ever tempting, as with my other bikes.
The Raleigh is only a ten speed anyway, two cogs up front (I left it on the smallest the whole time) and five at the rear, so essentially I’m using it as a five speed.
The brakes are pretty standard Weinmann calipers, not amazing, but better than I expected.
Again this is not a high speed racing or downhill mountain bike, so the stopping power is adequate. New cables and adjustment will probably help, and maybe some pads with a more effective modern compound – this summary was based on heading straight out with what look like the original Raleigh brake blocks on a bike that doesn’t look like it’s been touched in 20 years.
Another pleasing outcome was despite the wet roads and misty drizzle, I remained entirely unsplashed by the tyres, the original close fitting and fairly long mudguards doing their job admirably.
After getting home I broke out the T-Cut and gave the frame a quick once over, and aside from a few scratches and hints of rust, the lovely pale metallic blue paintwork has come up surprisingly well.
A further first for me is a lugged frame. Even though I know this wasn’t a high end bike in its day, it nods towards past tradition and besides just looks very stylish, in my eyes.
Talking of its age, the serial number is clearly visible and after a little Googling seems to suggest the frame was made in the original Raleigh Nottingham factory, in February 1985.
Which makes it a still willing 33 year old, the oldest bike I’ve owned by far.
Finally of course the fabled heron head badge, the same as on my Burner from the same era, which somehow neatly completes a cycling circle for me, like returning to a first love in some ways.
So where does this endearing Raleigh mixte fit in my collection (or “stable” as bike collector types seem to call it)?
It’s too early to say, but I know I don’t want four bikes. My wife would heartily concur.
The ebike will stay, and likely my Crossroads, with the old Rockhopper currently the least used and appealing.
(Update – I donated the Rockhopper to a local charity – Cyclists Fighting Cancer)
But based on my first ride, this Raleigh could become my only journey bike, with my ebike as a destination bike, and no need for anything else.
I don’t want to spend anything on the mixte, aside from new tubes and tyres. I like the idea of keeping it original and just using it as was intended, without any frankenbike mods.
Although I have to say restorations like Ana’s do look quite beautiful.
Have you returned to a first love in cycling or photography, and how did it work out? What did it give you that a modern equivalent hasn’t?
Please tell us all about it in the comments below (and don’t forget to tick the “Notify me of new comments via email” box to follow the conversation).
Thanks for looking. Please share this post with others you feel will enjoy it too. If you’re interested, this is what my photography and cycling life looks like right now.
10 thoughts on “Mixte Feelings – When Your First Love Returns”
Seems to me that you’ve swapped your buying of cameras for cycles, how many bikes is that now ? Not that I’m knocking you I ride and have two but they are very different and both serve differing styles of riding.
Old tech can have its place but the trouble is it’s just not as good as modern stuff. A good friend rode a Marin, old school, rim brakes etc on a ride with me c2c and on the descents looked terrified he wouldn’t stop. I Carried far more speed and could stop effortlessly, courtesy of disc brakes. We were camping on route so had bikes loaded he sold the Marin when we got back and is now on a modern variant.
In closing I wonder which bike from your past is next on the to buy list 😂
Thanks for your comments Martin!
As I said in the post, I’ve now donated the Rockhopper, so I have my ebike for commuting then the Specialized Crossroads hybrid and Raleigh mixte, so three bikes altogether. The Crossroads with its more upright position and Fat Frank tyres is very comfortable, and the Raleigh with its mixte frame, skinny tyres and drop bars is very different to ride. I like them both. I’ll decide probably in the spring when the weather improves again which to keep, perhaps both. I can cope with three bikes (as can our garden shed!)
About the brakes, well I had V brakes on my Rockhopper and they were great, even going pretty fast downhill, I had no issues whatsoever. The Crossroads ones are similar, not quite as good but more than adequate and I don’t have any thoughts about upgrading them.
If I was doing a lot of fast downhill riding off road I may think differently, but I’m not, so what I have is more than good enough for just cruising around, even the old Weinmann calipers on the Raleigh.
Good observation about collecting bikes replacing collecting cameras. I quickly became aware of this, hence nipping it in the bud and giving away the Rockhopper. I also had an FSR for a few months which just wasn’t right for what I needed so I sold that too.
Despite my overall fairly minimalist tendencies, I do have weaknesses sometimes. In the past it’s been trainers, cameras, and as we see, almost became bikes. But I’m settled on the latter two now, and can’t see any purchases of either any time soon. There are dozens of 80s and 90s mountain bikes I love the look of, but I know from having the FSR and Rockhopper, they just don’t suit what I actually need now, and as with cameras, I want bikes I use often, not museum pieces that sit gathering dust.
I returned to my first cycling love, of sorts, when I bought my 1986 Schwinn Collegiate 3-speed.
I had been a 3-speed rider ever since I outgrew the little BMX-style bikes (20 inch) that were popular in my late childhood. (Schwinn Sting Rays were popular in my early childhood, but we were too poor for me to own one.)
I bought a Schwinn mountain bike in about 1990 and it was okay. At least it had flat handlebars. I don’t like drop bars, or racers (ram’s horn style, whatever they’re called) as they make my back ache. What soured me on the MTB was that I could not find a saddle that didn’t put my legs to sleep on a long trip.
After my divorce when I wanted a bike again I got that Collegiate on Craigslist for $60, and then put $100 into a mechanical restoration. I lost the gumwall tires in the process – those are super hard to come by new, in Schwinn’s weird custom sizing.
I also have a 1973 Schwinn Collegiate 5-speed. I like the gearset a lot — 3-speeds can be such a nightmare to adjust and when they fail it’s an expensive replacement. But the frame is a little too small and it has the ram’s-horn handlebars, so I just don’t ride it very much. I’m probably going to sell it this summer. It, too, got a mechanical restoration a few years ago so it’s in good operating condition.
I wish I could find a flat-handlebar, larger-frame 5-speed. That would be just perfect.
Loved hearing about your bike stories Jim.
Can you not get some different handlebars for the 1973 Schwinn, or use the ones from the later one? Or would the frame still be too small?
I thought about replacing the handlebars on the 1973 Schwinn as it might let me skate by on the too-small frame. But I’m a stickler for originality and decided that it’s best to let that bike pass to someone who will appreciate and ride it. I hope to sell it in the spring. Here are the only photos I have of it:
That’s a lovely looking bike Jim! The quality of light adds a very nostalgic feel.
I think with vintage bikes you can go one of three ways –
1. Full authentic restoration so it looks almost new with as many original parts as possible. No expense spared.
2. Mechanical service, to get the original parts working as well as possible, replacing any consumables like tyres, brake blocks, cables etc with the available equivalents. A daily runner.
3. A frankenbike conversion, changing bars, tyres, seat, and anything else but the frame, perhaps even a respray. Anything goes!
I’m most likely to stay with option two for my Raleigh…
I did #2 to this bike, and my blue one. I would prefer to do a #1, but original or repro parts for old Schwinns are expensive or unobtainable.
Oh and I’ve seen pictures of your 3 speed I think (the blue one?) but do you have any pictures on your blog or Flickr of the 1973 model?
I have a 1974 Raleigh International which is truly “a love returned”. I had one as my main ride from 1983 until it was irreparably damaged in a crash in in 2008. Since then I have bought a number of other bikes, including a custom made titanium frame that I have over 40000 miles on. Still, I missed the Raleigh so 3 years ago I bought another one, same model, same year, and fitted it out just like at first. It too has narrow drop bars and stem shifters. It seems so natural when I ride it
I think it is muscle memory for me. I have lighter bikes, faster bikes, even more comfortable bikes, but this one is perfectly suited to it’s purpose.
Christopher, loved hearing about your reunion with an old flame! I often look at vintage bikes and swoon over how beautiful they look. But I fear I’m more in love with the idea of a vintage bike than actually having and using one, they somehow represent such freedom and innocence.
Though I do look at this site almost weekly and hover over the buy button!!