Late last year I decided I wanted a new project for the new year. One that would simultaneously keep my collection of cameras in check, but also allow me to try a new (old) one here and there, in particular classic digital compacts.
I also wanted to explore using one camera for a longer period. Hence, the One Month, One Camera project was born.
In January I chose a Canon Digital IXUS 870 IS, which it’s fair to say I was pretty surprised and delighted with. You can read my summary in this post.
So on to February.
Whilst it was very tempting to continue to ride the Canon wave and try an alternative model of theirs, I thought I’d save that for later in the year.
For the new month I also wanted something more challenging, a camera that was older and lesser on paper than the IXUS. And was perhaps a bit left field compared to what I personally have used before.
Enter the FujiFilm FinePix F810, released in 2004, making it 15 years old – positively over the hill in digital terms.
A quick glance at the spec, to see how it fits my remit for this project.
Put simply, I want to explore compact digital cameras that are 10MP or less, with a CCD sensor, SD memory card, and costing under £20.
The Fuji has a 6MP “Super CCD HR” 1/1.7 inch sensor, and set me back £15 plus postage.
It does fall down on the SD card compatibility, which I chose because I didn’t want to have to buy a different type of card that might cost as much as the camera. Fortunately the F810 came with a 512 Xd-Picture Card, good for 339 photographs at 6MP.
For the full spec and manual head to FujiFilm who to their credit still have it available.
My first impressions, after a couple of short photowalks with the F810 are thus –
Handling – It’s quite long for a compact, and whilst the handling is ok, with some effort spent on ergonomics, I’ve added my favourite grip tape front and back to improve this.
I generally shoot with two hands – my left forefinger and thumb forming a V to support the camera body whilst my right hand grips and operates – and this works very comfortably with the Fuji.
Build – Quite impressive, with plenty of metal, and it feels quite hefty, but not heavy. All the buttons feel good, in fact oddly the only thing that feels more flimsy is the main sliding “On” switch.
Operation – The buttons and menus are fairly logical in terms of what you’re offered, but this is obviously a very different camera to a Canon IXUS (which I found super straightforward) and isn’t without a few quirks.
For example there’s a button with an F (called the “Photo Mode (F)” button) which gives you a menu where you can adjust Quality (ie number of MP), ISO and FinePix Colour, the latter having Standard, B&W Film or Chrome Film as options. I like this, but then for other options like White Balance or Focus, you have to go into the main menu, which doesn’t seem consistent.
Then there are further separate dedicated buttons for Exposure Compensation, Continuous Shooting and “Photometry”, which seems a fancy way of saying Exposure Metering, and offers Multi, Spot and Average.
Then you have the main menu, and right at the end of this there’s an option called Set-Up which then opens up a further menu with functions like Power Save, AF Illuminator, Date Set etc. Oh and there’s yet another button on the front of the camera for Continuous AF.
It just all feels very muddled, disorganised and with too many buttons (I can count a faintly ludicrous 18 different physical buttons/dials/switches!) for things the average photographer won’t adjust much.
You can imagine this being designed by a committee of a dozen people and each of them chose a different function they wanted a dedicated button for…
Somehow the Canon IXUS (and other cameras like my Ricoh and Lumix bodies) manage to have virtually all of these features so much more intuitively accessible that I can’t even describe how you find them.
Because almost instantly from the get go I just knew where to go to change any particular feature, whereas with the Fuji there’s some trial and error.
At least the main mode dial is familiar, and features a great range for a compact camera, including P, A, S, M, full Auto and Scenes.
I’ve decided to use P (Program Shift) mode which finds the best combination of aperture and shutter speed for you, but still allows you to shift the values up and down in unison (using the rolling switch on the back – another unusual control for me, but I quite like it) whilst maintaining the correct exposure.
So if I want to influence the depth of field by changing the aperture, I still can.
This range of modes feels quite advanced for a consumer compact, but initial reviews suggest the original RRP was £399 in 2004, which equates to a heady £600 in today’s money.
Being the skinflint I am, I can’t imagine paying that for a compact (or indeed any) camera, but at the £15 it cost me it appears to represent fantastic value.
The screen is pretty good and offers a widescreen 16:9 option as well as the standard 4:3, which I’ll mostly likely stick to.
The flash is another aspect I found a bit confusing.
There’s one button that pops the flash up manually, then another button that then cycles between flash modes. But you can only use the latter once the flash is popped up,otherwise it does nothing. Thankfully, given that I never use flash, I’ve decided to ignore both of these buttons entirely.
The lens is 32.5mm – 130mm (35mm equivalent), so for the way I use compacts, a 32.5mm prime. A good balance I’d suggest, between the standard 35mm many feel is the optimum for these cameras (indeed all cameras!), and 28mm which can sometimes be a little distorted when shooting certain compositions.
So enough of the spec and features. How is it to use?
Well, let’s say I liked it a lot more after a couple of hours than I did at the beginning.
In practice, once set up, the only thing I adjusted was the AF Macro mode – there’s a button (of course!) to switch macro on or off. Everything else remained constant – ISO200 (it was a very overcast day – on a brighter day I’ll revert to ISO80), B&W Film mode, standard 4:3 aspect ratio, Multi Metering etc.
Overall so far I like the quality feel, size and weight, the decent enough screen (bright and detailed enough that you can see visually when the camera has focused), that roller switch to change Program Shift, and a perfectly responsive shutter button.
What caused some concern is the AF system, or more specifically the feedback.
There’s a cross within a square in the centre of the screen, which becomes just a square when you half press the shutter button to lock focus, and this is fine.
But there’s also a green AF light next to the titchy viewfinder, which is nearly always flashing, and hardly ever stays constant, as I assumed from experience of a dozen or more other cameras, it should when focus is locked.
Initially I was quite perturbed and thought the AF system overall was either faulty or just not very good in design.
I realised I can hear the lens focusing, I can see the central square lock, I can see in the screen itself that focus is on the object I want it to be on. But still that little green light keeps flashing.
I decided to read the manual back home (shocking, I know) and it says that light is the “Viewfinder Lamp”, rather than a simple AF lock lamp.
If it’s constant green, you’re ready to shoot. Flashing green means, and I quote the manual “AF/AE is in progress, camera shake warning or AF warning (ready to shoot)”. Which is next to useless in my view – how do you know which of these three it’s warning you about so you can adjust your approach?
So I decided to put a little square of black tape over it (and indeed the whole viewfinder which I’ll never use) and forget about it, so I don’t have to consciously block it out.
I have to say that, in contrast, the icons on the screen itself are excellent, and very intuitive.
When it can’t lock AF you get an “AF!”, when the shutter speed is below 1/60s you get a shaking hand to warn of possible camera shake, and when the aperture/shutter speed appear red, not blue, the required exposure is outside of the camera’s capable range.
All very logical and very helpful, along with showing the aperture and shutter speed at all, so a big plus all round here for the FinePix.
I think I’ve rambled enough about the various idiosyncrasies of the FujiFilm FinePix F810 (and no doubt if you’re reading this as a Fuji camera lover you’re thinking it’s all perfectly logical and wondering what I’m moaning about).
Once it’s set up for your preferences, and you get used to its ways, the F801 does feel like quite a classy camera to use, it handles pretty well, and as I said, the on screen feedback is great.
But what about the photographs? Is that lens and “Super CCD HD” sensor a winning combination?
All photographs in this post were made with the camera, so make your own judgement.
I think the Fuji delivers, and I’m certainly happy with the output.
Looking at these images alone I probably would have been surprised to hear they were made with a lowly 6MP 15 year old compact.
Using the B&W Film mode, as with most cameras, gives what I might call a “50 shades of grey” image. Being someone who prefers more contrast, whites to be bright white and blacks to be deep, inky blacks, this is a touch disappointing, if expected.
But it’s a minor concern, I just put the JPEGs through my usual Snapseed process to give them more life, which I did with all of the photographs in this post.
Overall after my initial qualms about the awkward interface, too many buttons and that silly viewfinder light (in fact the whole viewfinder), I’m starting to settle in well with the F810.
I know I like using it, and I know it can deliver pleasing photographs.
As February unfolds I’ll post again with more thoughts and pictures.
Have you ever used a similar FujiFilm FinePix compact? Did you find it as quirky as I do?
Please let us know in the comments below (and don’t forget to tick the “Notify me of new comments via email” box to follow the conversation).
Thanks for looking. Please share this post with others you feel will enjoy it too. If you’re interested, this is what I’m into right now.
12 thoughts on “One Month, One Camera – February 2019 (I)”
By coincidence, I recently blogged about the Finepix E550, which is a cut down version of your camera. I actually paid full price for it at the time, and I remember thinking it was pretty good value for money.
At the time, it was the first digicam I’d ever used, so the menu quirks didn’t bother me at all. Looking back, my only real quibble with the camera was it’s very pronounced colour fringing when shooting bright high contrast scenes. Of course, if you’re converting to mono, that’s not a consideration.
Hi Alex, thanks for your comments.
Just looking at a comparison site (https://www.digicamdb.com) it looks like there’s virtually no difference except the body, screen size and resolution and batteries. The lens and sensor seem identical, so you’d assume the photos would be too.
Wonder why they made two so similar? Probably trying to target two slightly different markets at once.
I’m sharing the link to your post so others can see more about the camera.
I have to say it is growing on me more and more, and the metal body and general feel of robustness is reassuring. Plus it’s pretty quick to fire up and power down again – not essential for my needs, but it just adds to that feeling that it’s capable, ready and willing to make photographs…
I will experiment with colour once the sunshine returns, and see how it goes. But it’s more likely to remain a mono machine I predict.
[…] in 2004), and it requires two AA batteries and an xD-Picture Card, like I already have in the FinePix F810 I’m using for […]
An intriguing little camera, Dan, and after seeing Alex’ beautiful shots on his own page, can’t think why anyone would let these Fuijis languish in drawers and cupboards unused (maybe they’re not; a quick look around eBay shows me exactly one, and that at a pricey postal hop distant, way overseas).
A couple of small matters – a look at the specs (on DPReview) and within the manual (via Fuji’s site) shows no mention of on-board image stabilization, Canon has got me hooked on that; helpful for low-ISO business and also given that I wave the camera about in one hand while discreetly snapping off a series of shots of a person in situ.
Please let us know if you find that a disadvantage.
Then there’s the cost of the recording media…
William, no I noticed too there is no mention of any image stabilisation, so we can fairly assume there isn’t any. I’ll let you know after further experimentation if this prevents me from getting images in low light, or needing to use a high ISO and then the image quality suffering too much.
[…] wrote an introduction to the camera here, and now I’ve had a couple more photowalks, I have more thoughts, and of course photographs, […]
Thank you for the review!
I would have two questions : Do you think the lack of image stabilization is a turn off ?
Can you use the optical/digital zoom while recording ?
Hi Enzo, thanks for your questions.
To reply –
1. It wasn’t really an issue for me, I don’t shoot in very dark places, or at night, it’s mostly in good daylight. Plus I can hold a camera fairly steady, and if it is lower light I brace myself against something. If you’re looking for camera for low light, I would suggest something later with higher ISO capability and image stabilisation. But as I said, it wasn’t something I really thought about or held me back with this Fuji, for my needs.
2. I didn’t/don’t use cameras to record video, just for still photography. I’m not sure this Fuji even can record video, I didn’t look as I never need it.
You can read more of my thoughts on this camera here –
Thanks for reading!
Thank you for your detailed reply! I went on and purchased the F810, absolutely love it in addition to my others cameras.
I’m glad I found your blog and review of it, definitely helped me on my choice.
Keep the good work,
Enzo, that’s great to hear. The F810 is an excellent camera. Needs a bit of work and manipulation sometimes, buy capable of excellent results, what Fuji seemed to lack in intuitive design and user interface (in my view), they made up for in the quality of lenses and sensors. I have an S7000 bridge camera which also has a 6MP Super CCD sensor, and also punches well above its weight in the final image. Enjoy!
Found this old blog post Googling around on this camera.
Here’s what’s really special about this camera–it’s got almost SLR control and RAW capability which can deliver a reasonable number of shots with a 1G or 2G xD memory card. As a result, it had a brief period when it was popular for underwater photography (which is why I have it).
Note–I’ve had two of them fail when the sensors went bad and am on my third one now and babying it because I have an expensive Ikelight underwater case for it. So were VERY lucky to find one to buy–they’re pretty rare in working condition.
Thanks for your comments George!
I don’t have this FinePix any longer, but it was a great little camera, despite some limitations and seemed to punch above its weight, image wise. RAW doesn’t appeal to me, I like cameras that give me results I like with the minimal amount (preferably none!) of post processing, so those are what I’ve gravitated towards in the last five years or so.
I do have a FinePix E900 though, which is similar in some ways and has a 1/1.6″ Super CCD sensor. Fun so far and like other Fuji compacts I’ve used, also seems impressive in the final image for its size and age. I’ll get around to writing a post on that at some point!