Joy In A Leather Jacket

Of the compact 35mm film cameras I’ve tried in the last few years, many have given decent results, but only one has combined quality images with genuine pocketability, and close enough (for me) focus.

That camera is the Olympus Mju 1 (or µ[mju:]-1), aka the Stylus in some territories. 

Well, I say only one camera. In truth, it’s not the last Jedi in this compact galaxy. No, Luke, there is another. Except it’s the same wolf. In different clothes.

Before my analogies become even more muddled, let’s introduce the Olympus LT-1. 


On the functionality side, it’s essentially a Mju 1. Same cracking little 35mm f/3.5 lens with a close (auto)focus of around 0.35m.

Same compact size. (It’s a bugbear of mine to have had so many cameras that claim to be compact, but have the bulk of a small SLR. Very few have been truly pocketable, as in a trouser pocket, not the centre kangaroo style pocket of a very oversized hoodie. But back to the pros of the LT-1…)

Same ability to astonish when you get your scans back and wonder if you mixed them up with photographs shot with an SLR (especially when shooting colour film as black and white).

The main difference with the LT-1 is its shape and outer shell. 

Left to right – AF-1 Mini, Mju-1, LT-1, all sharing the same 35mm f/3.5 lens

The Mju 1 is known for its curved, ergonomic shell, and the ease at which you can slide its clamshell cover open with a swift motion and be ready for shooting in an instant.

For me the original Mju perfected this, and where later Mju descendants tried to repeat the trick, they didn’t quite get it right.

The now ridiculously hyped Mju 2 (Stylus Epic) I found too small and too slippery, and if it wasn’t for the wrist strap I would have seen it meet a violent end against the pavement two or three times in just one roll of film. Way too pokey viewfinder too, but that’s another story.

I’ve had a couple of later zoom models in the Mju series and unfortunately the added bulk of the body required to house the zoom lens meant it was no longer pocketable.

Those curves, whilst near perfect on the original Mju, just made it even more uncomfortable when you did try to force it into your pocket, where a more typical smoothed brick shaped compact camera of the same depth would slide in and out with much greater ease.

The closest I’ve found was ironically another sibling in many ways to the Mju-1, the AF-1 Mini, pictured alongside its family above.

Same lens again, and a weatherproof body, but just slightly less pocketable than the Mju-1 – comfy in a coat, too tight for trousers. Oh and didn’t focus quite so close, more like 0.5m.

Back to the LT-1 and there’s (gasp!) no clamshell cover to slide open.

Instead we have a flip over leather flap that folds up over the lens, plus an on switch right next to the lens itself.



Initially I was sceptical and expected this to be slow and fiddly.

But Olympus cleverly designed the lens so even when the camera is on and the lens housing protrudes a couple of mm, the leather flap can still be over the lens without touching the glass.

Which means by keeping it switched on, on a photowalk it’s virtually as instantaneous as the Mju-1 – just flip the cover over with your thumb, point and shoot.

When the flap is closed, it reassuringly relocates itself in a second, thanks to the magnetic clasp. A clasp that is magnetic enough to stop it flapping open unwantedly, but not so strong that it can’t be flipped up quickly with your thumb tip when you’re ready to shoot.

Unlike the shiny smooth plastic of the Mju-1, the LT-1 has a fancy leather jacket. Sophistication indeed.


The shape is much more symmetric and rounded too, like a well washed pebble on the beach that you pick up and feels just right in your hands.

This curvy edged shape plus the extra grip of the leather surface make it handle at least as well as the Mju-1. 

These kind of details – the tactile leather, the on/off switch round the lens perfectly placed to operate with your middle finger, how the lens housing protrudes when switched on so the flap can be closed without touching the glass, and the perfectly weighted strength of the magnetic clasp – are not happy accidents.


Especially given Olympus’s track record (not least of the Mju-1 itself and its father/grandfather/godfather, the original XA), we can safely assume these were features specifically designed to make the LT-1 a very easy, almost invisible camera to use, yet at the same time that leather providing a hint of luxury unusual in a compact, unless you want to pay many hundreds of pounds more.


In short, for those seeking a very capable, close focusing, genuinely compact film camera, it’s joy in a leather jacket. 

So would I crown the LT-1 as my AF king compact?

Well I certainly wouldn’t be upset if I was told it was the only compact (indeed the only film camera) I could shoot from this point on.


Given its greater rarity, and the way those design features make me smile at Olympus’s intelligence and attention to detail each time I pick up, the LT-1 might just be my favourite compact, even trumping its older sibling the Mju-1.

Indeed my discovery of the Mju-1 , and then later the LT-1, feels very akin to being a teenage boy and finding a beautiful girl you spend a few months with and really start to think you might spend the rest of your life with her, gulp, only to discover she has an even cuter, quirkier and equally friendly younger sister.

In that irresistible leather jacket, of course.


As a confused adolescent male in that situation, which sister would you run away with?

What’s your favourite 35mm film compact? Please let us know in the comments below.

Thanks for reading. Please share this post with others you feel will enjoy it too.

31 thoughts on “Joy In A Leather Jacket”

    1. There’s little to complain about with either the LT-1 or Mju-1/Stylus, maybe the only thing is the flash can’t be turned off permanently, but that’s a complaint common to about 99% of compacts! With the LT-1, you can switch it on, switch the flash off, then just use the flap as a cover in between shots, rather than switching on and the flash off for every shot. Plus at least it and the Mju-1 tell you when they’re going to flash with the red warning light in the VF.

  1. I’ve never tried an AF compact, but my XA2 is always in my coat pocket (genuinely with me every time I leave the house) and it’s great. Only problem I have is with framing as I prefer SLRs and am used to lining up the shots perfectly. Need to investigate the Olympus Pen F as it’s a tiny SLR. Ever tried it?

    1. The XA2 and XA are probably the best non-AF compacts I’ve used!

      Not tried the Pen F, you mean the high end half frame SLR? I only tried one of the fixed lens Pen EEs.

      1. Yes, exactly. I Have a Pen EE 2, it’s nice but I don’t really love it. Same with my Trip 35, it’s beautifully designed but doesn’t inspire me for some reason.

      2. Why not an OM? You want the half frame?

        Some cameras are technically amazing and easy to admire but may be difficult to connect and have a chemistry with.

    1. Had to Google that one, never heard of it. But the lens assembly looks near identical to the TF-900, which has a twin 35 and 70mm lens and gave me excellent results.

      I bought a broken one cheap to salvage the lens and experiment on my Sony NEX and was even more impressed –

      Ricoh made some real gems in the compact class, and I’ve been very impressed with some of their Pentax K mount lenses too.

  2. I have always wanted one of these but been reluctant to press the buy, great photos and review…I might take the plunge.

    1. Frank, the LT-1 and Mju-1 are descendants of the XA2 as you know, the main difference being they’re Autofocus. I got to the point with trying so many compacts that I thought if I was going to keep one, it might as well be as pure and pocketable a point and shoot as possible, including AF. Which the LT-1 and Mju-1 are. I love the XA2 and the zone focus is very well designed. But again like most compacts they don’t focus particularly close.

      1. For me that’s just not good enough. I probably take 75% of my shots at closer than 0.5m! I think this is another reason I’ve never got into rangefinders. They seem to fall between stools – not as versatile or controllable or close focusing as an SLR, and yet bulkier and heavier than a compact.

      2. I’m somewhat late to this conversation, but I came across your blog whilst looking for info on the LT-1 I got on eBay for £50 (including postage) earlier this year. It was well used, and the leatherette was showing signs of cracking, and the edges were flaking. Mixing a couple of bottle of acrylic leather paint got me close to the original brown and it has become my favourite autofocus point and shoot- and it’s very difficult to choose between this and my XA for favourite pocketable! (As I type this, my black Trip is glaring at me)
        I love my LT-1 and feel I got an absolute bargain, especially as they are hitting £120+ on eBay now.

      3. Thanks for your comments Paul. I re-read my LT-1 post (it was a while back, and I sold the camera since) and remembered what I enjoyed about it. Yes if I was going to get another 35mm film compact it would be a Mju-1 or LT-1. I had two, a black one and a brown one, and think they were only about £12-15 each. Given the £120+ you talk about, £50 sounds reasonable!

  3. That’s a really intriguing little camera – I like it! I haven’t owned or shot the Mju ii but wouldn’t dream of paying that much for a P&S camera. I have a lightly-battered Mju iii zoom which was (at least until recently) my go-to throw-in-a-bag 35mm point and shoot. It’s pretty compact but not in the same way as a small digital would be. However, the other week my wife picked up a Mju V at our local garage sale for £2. I didn’t know that the Mju range went that high. It is really compact – smaller than the larger of my two digital compacts – and nice to shoot too, if a bit shiny and “bling”. I’ve only put one roll through it so don’t know what the pictures will come out like, but if they’re any good I can see it being a keeper.

    1. Richard I think if anyone can find a Mju-II for a few pounds they’re worth a try. But I wouldn’t pay £20 for one to have for myself, only to sell for profit. I stumbled across one a couple of years ago for £2 in a charity shop, and despite its bargain status, it didn’t appeal to me any more. Still found it very annoying and slippery to use.

      I was after a Mju V for a while, I think they were Olympus’s last fling with the Mju range and they wanted to go out on a high. It’s the one with the shiny mirrored metal body right?

      1. That’s the one – it’s very, very shiny! But solid too – a lot of metal in the construction. It is in pretty much mint condition, in the box with the original receipt from 2003 (from the duty free at Dubai Airport, curiously!) There can’t have been too many new 35mm cameras developed after that point and I’d certainly been shooting digital for a while by then. The film I’ve shot was left in the camera by the owner with 10 shots taken (some ISO 200 stuff from Jessops) so I shot the rest and will have it developed. Obviously, it could have expired horribly so I may well put a roll of something fresh through before deciding whether to keep it or not. A compact P&S is good to have when you feel like channelling your internal Daido Moriyama!

    1. Glad you found one, please let us know how you get on. I still think the LT-1 is one of the best film compacts with a prime lens, and still affordable.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s