Photography Experience – The Ever Flowing River

“What I love most about rivers is / You can’t step in the same river twice / The water’s always changing, always flowing…”

Thus sang Pocahontas in her eponymous film, which, like many Disney films, I’ve seen on more than one occasion. (I watch them for the kids’ benefit, honest!)

However, a flowing river seems to be an entirely apt metaphor for photography too. 

In the 13 or 14 years I’ve been making photographs with intention, I’ve gone from knowing nothing but how to point a camera phone and press a button to get an image, to understanding the essentials of aperture, depth of field, focal length, shutter speed, exposure compensation, and so on.

And when you’re on an adventure where your learning is fluid (like the river), you find that using a camera for a while, then coming back to it three months, a year, three, five, 10 years later, the way you use it has changed.

Because of what you’ve picked up in the intervening time, and because your needs and tastes have changed too.

For example, around 2010 I was using a Sony Elm (J10i2) phone as my only camera.

And pretty much sticking to Auto everything, pointing and shooting.

All I recall I did know beyond this was that squeezing the shutter button halfway down (yes, a phone with a dedicated, physical shutter button, hallelujah!) meant it locked focus, then I could reframe if I needed, when the subject I wanted to focus on wasn’t right in the middle of the composition. Which was more often than not.


When I found the Elm in a box last summer (2018), some eight years on, the first thing I did after charging it, was delve into the menus and see what I had control over.

As with most digital cameras, I set the exposure compensation to -0.3 to take the edge of clipped highlights (the most common failing of small sensor cameras I would suggest).

I also set the colour mode to b/w, which has been my dominant preference from perhaps two years now.

Once the Elm was set up how I wanted, I did use it pretty much as a point and shoot.

But I knew if/when the highlights blew out, I could adjust exposure compensation.

And having the screen show b/w meant I could better seek out images that suited b/w better than colour.

In other words, my experience with other cameras over the years between gave me more control over the old Sony Elm, and meant a higher rate of keepers – photographs I liked enough to want to keep and share.

There is a downside I’m finding with this ever flowing river metaphor though.

That is, I keep thinking back to a certain few cameras I no longer have, and wondering if I had have kept them, would I now be able to get more from them (enjoyment, control, the final image) than I did at the point where, for whatever reason, I got rid of them?

A case in point is the two Sony Alpha DSLRs I first had around the spring of 2017.

When I look back now at photos I made with my favourite of the two, the a100, I really like those images.


I wonder why I ever sold it.

Even more than this, I wonder what I could do with the same camera now, over two years on.

Or two years further down the river.

Now most cameras I’ve let go of, I’ve done so for good reason. And I haven’t looked back.

But perhaps with some, like those Sony Alphas, I was a little hasty with, and maybe should have just put in a box for three or six months then decided.

How about you? Have you come back to cameras after a time away and realised how much your photography experience has grown in the interim? Or sold a camera, then bought the same one years down the line? 

Please let us know in the comments below (and don’t forget to tick the “Notify me of new comments via email” box to follow the conversation).

Thanks for looking.

What Next?

Share this post with someone you think will enjoy it using the buttons below.

Read a random post from the archives.

See what I’m up to About Now.

7 thoughts on “Photography Experience – The Ever Flowing River”

  1. Love it that you referenced Disney over Heraclitus! And by the same token, every photograph – a ‘moment in time’ – can never be viewed the same way twice? Really enjoy reading your blog, thanks!

    1. Hi Jeff, thanks for reading, and your comments.

      The amount of Disney I’ve watched in the last decade means probably a third of the time my internal jukebox is playing something Disney or other!

      Love your extension of the idea, absolutely, and this applies to any art form. I know that music I’ve been aware for a long time has had different meanings over the years, depending on where I’ve been in my life. I think all great art is like that, it’s ambiguous enough that we can each apply our own meaning and understanding, make it feel like it was made for us.

  2. The answer is: sometimes yes, sometimes no. When you apply what you’ve learned to an old camera, you might be able to get more from it — unless doing so only further reveals the camera’s inherent limitations.

    1. I think that can work two ways Jim, yes. Sometimes the extra knowledge and experience means you can get more from a camera, and sometimes it spoils the experience a little, because you realise a limitation of the camera that previously your were blissfully unaware of.

      1. Yes. I used to love my Kodak Z730 digital but the last time I shot it I realized just how limited it was. I’m not sure I’ll ever use it again.

      2. Similar with my old Sony Elm camera phone, but mostly it made me yearn for simpler times, where I just focused and shot, oblivious to all other settings but still enjoyed the results…

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s