It’s rare that the latest 35hunter post you’re reading was written just hours before publishing.
Usually, I have three or four posts queued up ahead of time ready to be published.
This gives me a buffer that absorbs the inevitable fluctuations in my writing time (I don’t write a fixed amount every day, or even every week) and takes the pressure off having to write something so soon before publishing, and rushing it unnecessarily.
This also helps with editing, I believe.
If I wrote a post then published immediately, it’s inevitable it would be more clumsy grammatically, and there’d definitely be more typos.
Returning to a draft post to tidy it up reduces the errors, and hopefully helps it read more fluently for you.
From experience though, there’s an optimum limit to this buffer of new posts.
At times I’ve had perhaps six or seven posts lined up.
The upside is a greater buffer and less pressure to write a new post quickly.
But the downsides, for me, outweigh any benefits.
First, I have a pretty steady stream of new ideas for blog posts, and sometimes I want to share those ideas as soon as possible.
Writing a new post then switching it with the next one in the pipeline is pretty simple.
Even pushing back two or three others is no great hardship.
But when it comes to six or seven, trying to reorder them one by one, or even just push each one back to the next 48 hour slot, becomes fiddly and laborious.
I’m a big fan of WordPress on many levels but one thing I’ve not been able to understand is why they don’t have simple drag and drop calendar, where you can reorder your upcoming posts in seconds, by just clicking and dragging a post to a different day.
But they don’t, and since I finally succumbed to the new “blocks” update to the WP editor a couple of months back, it’s even more manual than before – the calendar only ever shows the post you’re editing, not other scheduled posts. Why??
Anyway, so all this reworking of the publishing dates becomes very tedious with any more than about three posts.
Second, I just like the fundamental concept that a blog is about what’s going on in your life now.
I wouldn’t like to have a blog that’s constantly weeks out of date, because I always had 10 or 12 or more posts lined up.
Whilst I try to write in a way that’s timeless and still useful to the reader long beyond the date I wrote it, I don’t want to feel like a newsagent constantly selling last month’s magazines, and nothing newer.
Third, the bigger the gap between the writing date and publishing date, the more detached I become from the post.
Again, a week or so is fine, it’s all still current to me.
But those times where I’ve experimented with publishing weeks in advance, once the posts are published, my thinking (and usually the cameras and projects I’m working with) have already moved on, and my interest has significantly waned.
Which means I’m less engaged in the conversation around the post, than if it was something far more “hot off the press” in my photography life.
All of this is personal preference, of course.
I know some do schedule far more in advance than me and are happy with it, it works for them.
And others have no particular schedule, write when they feel like it and publish immediately.
And this is as always the crux of blogging – trying to find the ways, and the platforms, and the topics, and the frequency, and the audience that makes it works for each of us.
How about you? What works for you as a blogger – and a blog reader, and how “current” do you like the posts to be?
Please let us know in the comments below (and don’t forget to tick the “Notify me of new comments via email” box to follow the conversation).
Thanks for looking.
Share this post with someone you think will enjoy it using the buttons below.
See what I’m up to About Now.